United States v. Pressey
United States v. Pressey
472 F. App'x 254
United States v. Pressey
Opinion of the Court
Ronell McKinley Pressey appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Pressey, No. 4:01-cr-00083-RBS-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 8, 2011 & Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.