United States v. Williams
United States v. Williams
473 F. App'x 292
United States v. Williams
Opinion of the Court
Lionel Elizah Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct an alleged clerical error pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 2:90-cr-00149-JAM-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.