Johnny Lee Gore appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not lower Gore’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the dis*298trict court’s order. We note that the record clearly shows that Gore’s Guidelines sentence was based upon his admission that he was responsible for 141 kilograms of powder cocaine and not on a quantity of crack cocaine. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.