U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Haka v. Mecklenburg County

Haka v. Mecklenburg County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2012 · Davis, Gregory, Shedd
474 F. App'x 263

Haka v. Mecklenburg County

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Haka appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haka v. Mecklenburg Cnty., No. 3:12-cv-00100-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. May 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.