U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Wiley v. Buncombe County

Wiley v. Buncombe County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2012 · Davis, Gregory, Shedd
474 F. App'x 285

Counsel

Carl Edward Wiley, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis William Euler, Buncombe County Attorney’s Office, Asheville, North Carolina; David John Adinolfí, II, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Wiley v. Buncombe County

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Edward Wiley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wiley’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion for application for appearance of counsel form, bar admission, and ECF registration form, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wiley v. Buncombe Cnty., No. 1:10-cv-00181-RJC, 2012 WL 683112 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.