U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Weber v. Aiken-Partain

Weber v. Aiken-Partain
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2012 · Davis, Gregory, Shedd
474 F. App'x 288

Weber v. Aiken-Partain

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mauricio E. Weber appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Weber v. Aiken-Partain, No. 8:11-cv-02423-GRA, 2012 WL 489148 (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 2012). We deny Weber’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.