U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Ellerbe

United States v. Ellerbe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 16, 2012 · Hamilton, King, Wilkinson
474 F. App'x 376

United States v. Ellerbe

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-00100-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.