U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Ingram

United States v. Ingram
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 14, 2012 · Diaz, Niemeyer, Wynn
474 F. App'x 935

United States v. Ingram

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Curry Donnell Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 4:01-cr-00081-RAJ-l (E.D.Va. Feb. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.