United States v. Ingram
United States v. Ingram
474 F. App'x 935
United States v. Ingram
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Curry Donnell Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 4:01-cr-00081-RAJ-l (E.D.Va. Feb. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.