McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc., 474 F. App'x 999 (4th Cir. 2012)

McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Associates Inc.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony McNeish appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint after it was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McNeish v. Big Sarge Bail Bonds Assocs., No. 5:1 1-cv-00739-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Anthony MCNEISH, Plaintiff—Appellant v. BIG SARGE BAIL BONDS ASSOCIATES INC. Manley Yates John Doe, Defendants—Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published