U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2012 · Hamilton, King, Thacker

475 F. App'x 461

Counsel

Gary M. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Roger Hildebeidel, Morris Hardwick Schneider, PLLC, Dulles, Virginia; Amy Elizabeth Miller, McGuirewoods, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Anand Vijay Ramana, McGuirewoods, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Mohnkern v. Equifax Information Services, LLC (District Court, W.D. New York 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary M. Gray appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint and its denial of his post-judgment motions to amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) and to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gray v. Wittstadt Title & Escrow Co., No. 4:11-cv-00111-MSD-TEM (E.D.Va., Nov. 28, 2011, Jan. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.