U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 20, 2012 · Gregory, Niemeyer, Wilkinson
475 F. App'x 475

United States v. Mitchell

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mitchell, No. 2:90-cr-00020-2 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.