U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Harris

United States v. Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2012 · Hamilton, King, Thacker
475 F. App'x 928

United States v. Harris

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Eugene Harris appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to move for a sentence reduction based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Harris, No. 1:07-cr-00115-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. April 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.