U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Francis

United States v. Francis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 21, 2012 · Hamilton, King, Thacker
475 F. App'x 940

United States v. Francis

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Patrick Earl Francis appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Francis, No. 7:94-cr-40106-JLK-4 (W.D.Va. May 18, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.