U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Quick

United States v. Quick
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 10, 2012 · Hamilton, Motz, Wilkinson
476 F. App'x 423

United States v. Quick

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin Quick appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Quick, No. 3:96-cr-00134-FDW-6 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.