U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Grissett

United States v. Grissett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 2012 · Diaz, Duncan, King
476 F. App'x 529

United States v. Grissett

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cedric Jamal Grissett appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Grissett, No. 4:06-cr-00583-TLW-4 (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.