U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Haynes

United States v. Haynes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 2012 · Duncan, Floyd, Hamilton
476 F. App'x 538

United States v. Haynes

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for correction of judgment under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Haynes, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM-TEM-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 23, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.