U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Darden

United States v. Darden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 10, 2012 · Diaz, Duncan, Wilkinson
478 F. App'x 9

United States v. Darden

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Lamont Darden appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Darden, No. 4:08-cr-00089-MSD-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.