U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Murray

United States v. Murray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 14, 2012 · Agee, Niemeyer, Shedd
478 F. App'x 36

United States v. Murray

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rudolph Valentino Murray appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error, given that Murray is ineligible for the reduction that he seeks. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Murray, No. 2:97-cr-00025-AWA-1 (E.D.Va. May 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.