U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Starkes

United States v. Starkes
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 17, 2012 · Agee, Thacker, Wynn
478 F. App'x 772

United States v. Starkes

Opinion of the Court

*773Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Keith Lamont Starkes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Starkes, No. 3:08-cr-00161-HEH-1 (E.D.Va. May 8, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.