Muhammad v. Cochrane
Muhammad v. Cochrane
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and entering judgment of $2000 for Muhammad in accordance with a jury verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny the motions for transfer and for a transcript and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.