U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Turnage v. Astrue

Turnage v. Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 15, 2012 · Diaz, Duncan, King
485 F. App'x 635

Turnage v. Astrue

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gloria Turnage appeals the magistrate judge’s order affirming the denial of social security disability benefits.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible *636error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Turnage v. Astrue, No. 3:11-cv-00785-DJN (E.D.Va. July 11, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.