U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

Queen v. Warden

Queen v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 31, 2012 · Agee, Motz, Wilkinson
486 F. App'x 374

Queen v. Warden

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas James Queen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Queen v. Warden, No. 1:12-cv-02257-WMN (D.Md. Aug. 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.