U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Chalk

United States v. Chalk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 5, 2012 · King, Motz, Niemeyer
486 F. App'x 388

United States v. Chalk

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Chalk appeals the district court’s order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chalk, No. *3890:04-cr-00657-JFA-6 (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.