U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Knox

United States v. Knox
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 27, 2012 · Floyd, Shedd, Traxler
490 F. App'x 585

United States v. Knox

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Earl Knox appeals the district court’s orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce his sentence and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Knox, No. 3:03-cr-00220-FDW-4 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2012, Aug. 1, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*586terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.