U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2012

United States v. Hoey

United States v. Hoey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 26, 2012 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
491 F. App'x 447

United States v. Hoey

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tony Hoey appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Hoey, No. 4:96-cr-00053-MR-13 (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2012; Aug. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.