U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Clarence Johnson v. Wells Fargo

Clarence Johnson v. Wells Fargo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 12, 2013

Clarence Johnson v. Wells Fargo

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1551

CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00419-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: June 24, 2013 Decided: July 12, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Wells Fargo, No. 1:13-cv-00419- LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.