U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

In Re: Robert Rushie v.

In Re: Robert Rushie v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 18, 2013

In Re: Robert Rushie v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1498

In Re: ROBERT EVERTON RUSHIE, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:00-cr-00396-NCT-1)

Submitted: July 10, 2013 Decided: July 18, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Everton Rushie, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Robert Everton Rushie petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his November 23, 2011 motion for reduction of sentence and appointment of counsel. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Rushie’s motion by order entered on May 30, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently denied Rushie’s motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.