U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Cleo Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul

Cleo Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 1, 2013

Cleo Christopher v. St. Vincent de Paul

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1281

CLEO ANTHANETT CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC.; JOHN J. SCHIAVONE, Executive Director; STEPHANIE ARCHIE-SMITH, Deputy Director; MICHELLE YOUNG; REGINALD U. SCRIBER, Deputy Commissioner; SHANNON BURROUGHS-CAMPBELL, Chief Operations Officer; SHANNON HARRIS-ROBERTSON; PORTIA MCCONNELL; TONI ADAIR, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02309-CCB)

Submitted: July 11, 2013 Decided: August 1, 2013

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cleo Anthanett Christopher, Appellant Pro Se. Steven G.

Metzger, Brian Travis Tucker, GALLAGHER EVELIUS & JONES, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Gary Gilkey, Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Cleo Anthanett Christopher appeals the district court’s order dismissing her disability discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christopher v. St. Vincent DePaul of Baltimore, Inc., No. 1:12-cv-02309-CCB (D. Md. Feb. 7, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.