U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Zaman Ashraf

United States v. Zaman Ashraf
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2013

United States v. Zaman Ashraf

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ZAMAN ASHRAF, a/k/a Pop, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:03-cr-00458-REP-3)

Submitted: July 22, 2013 Decided: August 2, 2013

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zaman Ashraf, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Zaman Ashraf appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Ashraf, No. 3:03-cr-00458-REP-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.