U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Charmaine Anderson v. Gregory Jacko

Charmaine Anderson v. Gregory Jacko
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 6, 2013

Charmaine Anderson v. Gregory Jacko

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1340

CHARMAINE L. ANDERSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GREGORY JACKO, Commissioner, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (8:11-cv-01370-JFM)

Submitted: July 19, 2013 Decided: August 6, 2013

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charmaine L. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charmaine L. Anderson appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing her employment discrimination complaint, denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion for reconsideration, and denying her subsequent motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Anderson v. Jacko, No. 8-11-cv-01370-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 11, 2013). In addition, we note that Anderson has waived certain claims by failing to raise them in her informal brief, see Wahi v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 562 F.3d 599, 607 (4th Cir. 2009), and has waived other claims by raising them for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.