U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Richard Fairbank

Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Richard Fairbank
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 23, 2013

Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Richard Fairbank

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1257

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Ivan Darnell Davis, Magistrate Judge. (1:12-mc-00028-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: August 9, 2013 Decided: August 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion. The district court previously dismissed his proposed complaint without prejudice.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.