U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Lamatavous Collins

United States v. Lamatavous Collins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 27, 2013

United States v. Lamatavous Collins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. LAMATAVOUS REGTEZ COLLINS, a/k/a Red, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3)

Submitted: August 22, 2013 Decided: August 27, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamatavous Regtez Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D.

Ragsdale, John David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Lamatavous Regtez Collins appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for a new trial and denying his motion for the return of forfeited property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we deny leave to proceed under the Criminal Justice Act, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Collins, No. 1:10-cr-00466-MBS-3 (D.S.C. June 24, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.