Clarence Johnson v. Henrico County Government
Clarence Johnson v. Henrico County Government
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1853
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HENRICO COUNTY GOVERNMENT; LANCE WATSON, Dr.; DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00286-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: August 30, 2013 Decided: September 11, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence D. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Clarence D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Henrico Cnty. Gov’t, No. 1:13- cv-00286-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. June 19, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.