U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Charles Canady

United States v. Charles Canady
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2013

United States v. Charles Canady

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6666

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHARLES G. CANADY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:02-cr-00127-F-2)

Submitted: September 19, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles G. Canady, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Ethan A.

Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Charles G. Canady appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr- 00127-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.