U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Jesse Yarborough v. Lieutenant Sappington

Jesse Yarborough v. Lieutenant Sappington
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2013

Jesse Yarborough v. Lieutenant Sappington

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6530

JESSE YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT SAPPINGTON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SEXTON; DR. CLAUDIUS, Defendants – Appellees and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; TYRANE L. MORGAN; M. BAILEY; J.

BASKVILLE; MRS. HOSHER; P.A. FALLON, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03083-D)

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jesse Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, FMC BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER, Butner, North Carolina; Edward D.

Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Following a bench trial on the remaining claims in Jesse Yarborough’s civil rights action, which was filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the district court entered judgment in favor of Defendants. We have reviewed Yarborough’s claims on appeal in conjunction with the record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yarborough v. Sappington, No. 5:09- ct-03083-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.