Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Santosh Raj Shrestha, a native and citizen of Nepal, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals *240 (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his requests for asylum, * withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Shrestha’s merits hearing, his application for relief, and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2006), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Shrestha (B.I.A. Feb. 14, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.