UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1637

SALAME M. AMR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA; GREGORY CLAYTON FLEMING; RONALD NICHOLAS REGNERY; SCOTT GREGORY CROWLEY, SR.; CROWLEY & CROWLEY LAW FIRM,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:11-cv—00423-REP-MHL)

Submitted: September 25, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Salame M. Amr, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Crooks Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Salame M. Amr appeals the district court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying his

“Petition for Pre-filing Motions and Amended Petition for Pre-

filing of Motions and Responses.” We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Amr v. Att’y Gen., No.

3:11-cv-00423-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2013). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2