Ronnie Shelton v. Carolyn Colvin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ronnie Shelton v. Carolyn Colvin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1504

RONNIE T. SHELTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Social Security Administration; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Disability Services; DISABILITY DETERMINATION SERVICES; SHARON L. GOTTOVI, Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative Services, Disability Determination Services; BARRY LAWLOR, Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative Services, Disability Determination Services,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

PEGGY CARTER, Social Security, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review; WINNIE J. WHITING, Social Security, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW)

Submitted: September 27, 2013 Decided: October 4, 2013

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie T. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Erin Laura Barrett, Pamela Brown Beckner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Ronnie T. Shelton appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing Shelton’s civil complaint in part, and granting the

Commissioner’s motion to remand. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Shelton v. Astrue, No.

5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW (W.D. Va. filed Feb. 15, 2013; entered

Feb. 19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished