United States v. Trent Trowell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Trent Trowell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6826

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRENT D. TROWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00318-HEH-1)

Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trent D. Trowell, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arlen Jagels, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Trent D. Trowell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished