United States v. Robert Rushie

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Robert Rushie

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7296

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EVERTON RUSHIE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00396-NCT-1)

Submitted: October 7, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Everton Rushie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Everton Rushie appeals the district court’s

order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582

(c)(2) (2006) motions for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Rushie, No. 1:00-cr-

00396-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. May 30, 2013). We deny Rushie’s motion to

appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished