U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Ricky Gamble v. George Kenworthy

Ricky Gamble v. George Kenworthy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 21, 2013 · Agee, Davis, Keenan, Per Curiam
543 F. App'x 331

Ricky Gamble v. George Kenworthy

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ricky Gamble appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against them. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Gamble’s motions for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gamble v. Kenworthy, No. 5:12-ct03010-D (E.D.N.C. May 15, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.