Corey Robinson v. T. Clark

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Corey Robinson v. T. Clark

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7019

COREY JAWAN ROBINSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAPTAIN T. CLARK; MS. D. BAILEY, Classification; LIEUTENANT J. WILLIAMS; OFFICER MOSHER; LOLITA M. LEE; SHERISSE D. BIRCH; LORETTA AIKEN; WARDEN WAYNE MCCABE; IGC B. J. THOMAS; OFFICER J. MIDDLETON; OFFFICER JEREMY JOHNSON; NURSE LUANNE MAUNEY; NURSE J. SCOTT; ANN HALLMAN; OFFICER TABITHA FORD; MS. S. JONES; MAJOR THIERRY NETTLES; ASSOCIATE WARDEN FRED THOMPSON; WILLIAM BRIGHTHARP; CAPTAIN ANN SHEPPARD,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

SERGEANT J. ARANDA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00502-JMC)

Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Jawan Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Elloree Ann Ganes, Thomas Happel Scurry, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina; Michael Charles Tanner, MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Corey Jawan Robinson appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Robinson v. Clark, No. 5:12-cv-00502-JMC (D.S.C.

June 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished