Victor Padilla v. Roy Priest

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Victor Padilla v. Roy Priest

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1830

VICTOR L. PADILLA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ROY O. PRIEST; OTHERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00287-CMH-IDD)

Submitted: October 21, 2013 Decided: October 23, 2013

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor L. Padilla, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Jay Weiser, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee Roy O. Priest.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which

relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No. 1:13-cv-00287-

CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013, and entered June 26,

2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished