Victor Padilla v. Roy Priest
Victor Padilla v. Roy Priest
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1830
VICTOR L. PADILLA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROY O. PRIEST; OTHERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00287-CMH-IDD)
Submitted: October 21, 2013 Decided: October 23, 2013
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor L. Padilla, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Jay Weiser, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee Roy O. Priest.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Victor L. Padilla appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Padilla v. Priest, No. 1:13-cv-00287-
CMH-IDD (E.D. Va. filed June 25, 2013, and entered June 26,
2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished