U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

Wayne Resper v. Derek Baer

Wayne Resper v. Derek Baer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2013

Wayne Resper v. Derek Baer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6769

WAYNE RESPER, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DEREK A. BAER, C. O. II, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-00691-PJM)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Resper, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Wayne Resper appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Resper v. Baer, No. 8:12- cv-00691-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 19 & May 2, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.