U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

United States v. Aaron Battle

United States v. Aaron Battle
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2013

United States v. Aaron Battle

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6877

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. AARON SCOTT BATTLE, a/k/a Flocko, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:98-cr-00322-NCT-3)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Scott Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Aaron Scott Battle appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Battle, No. 1:98-cr-00322-NCT-3 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 15, 2013). We deny Battle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.