Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mark Panowicz v. Sharon Hancock

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1790

MARK A. PANOWICZ,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SHARON L. HANCOCK, in individual capacity; SHARON L. HANCOCK, Clerk of the Circuit Court for Charles County (in official capacity),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:11-cv-02417-DKC)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Panowicz seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying the parties’ cross-motions for reconsideration of

the court’s order granting in part and denying in part

Defendant’s motion to dismiss Panowicz’s civil action and

denying Panowicz’s motion for leave to amend his complaint.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541, 545-46

(1949). The

order Panowicz seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished