U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2013

John Singletary, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage

John Singletary, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 24, 2013

John Singletary, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1771

JOHN G. SINGLETARY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO WACHOVIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION, its employees to include agents individually and collectively to include David Bates, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:11-cv-00484-RMG)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John G. Singletary, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lydia Blessing Applegate, Stafford J. McQuillin, III, William Howell Morrison, John H. Tiller, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Charleston, South Carolina; Hamlet Sam Mabry, III, HAYNSWORTH, SINKLER & BOYD, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: John G. Singletary, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order granting summary judgment in favor of Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage Corporation in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singletary v. Wells Fargo Wachovia Mortgage Corp., No. 2:11-cv-00484-RMG (D.S.C. May 16, 2013). We deny Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.