Barbara Dang v. BWW Law Group
Barbara Dang v. BWW Law Group
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1740
In re: BARBARA KIM DANG,
Debtor,
----------------------------------------------
BARBARA KIM DANG,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
BWW LAW GROUP, f/k/a Bierman, Geesing & Ward, LLC; QUICKEN LOANS; ONE WEST BANK, f/k/a Indy Mac Bank, FSB; DEUTCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY; DB INDX 2006-AR27; HOWARD N. BIERMAN; JACOB GEESING; CARRIE M. WARD; BIERMAN, GEESING & WARD, LLC; DOES 1-200,
Defendants – Appellees,
ELLEN W. COSBY,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-03342-RDB)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barbara Kim Dang, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Daniel Cohen, BIERMAN GEESING WARD & WOOD, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland; Joseph Yenouskas, Daniel E. Zytnick, GOODWIN & PROCTER, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Catherine Keller Hopkin, TYDINGS & ROSENBERG, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Adam M. Lynn, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Easton, Maryland; James Burton Travis, Crofton, Maryland; Ellen W. Cosby, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Barbara Kim Dang appeals from the district court’s
order dismissing her adversary proceeding that was filed in the
bankruptcy court. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Dang v. BWW Law Group, No. 1:12-cv-
03342-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished