United States v. Marlo Brown
United States v. Marlo Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7111
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MARLO BROWN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00426-RDB-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlo Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin M. Block, Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Barbara Slaymaker Sale, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Marlo Brown appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on Brown’s
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Brown, No.
1:07-cr-00426-RDB-1 (D. Md. June 25, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished