United States v. Mark Wright
United States v. Mark Wright
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7071
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARK WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:11-cr-00078-TLW-9)
Submitted: October 21, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mark Wright appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for specific performance to compel the Government to
file a motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States
v. Wright, No. 4:11-cr-00078-TLW-9 (D.S.C. May 10, 2013). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished