United States v. Mark Wright

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mark Wright

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7071

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARK WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (4:11-cr-00078-TLW-9)

Submitted: October 21, 2013 Decided: October 25, 2013

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark Wright appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for specific performance to compel the Government to

file a motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States

v. Wright, No. 4:11-cr-00078-TLW-9 (D.S.C. May 10, 2013). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished